I guarantee an rme will outdo a duet in any daw benchmark test on the same mac.īut the figures you are reporting are what they were back then right? They are the figures I used to get. You do realise the OP asked for the BEST PERFORMANCE right? that means maximum amount of plugins, least crackles and pops. If you want RELIABLE LOW LATENCY and apogee, you have to go thunderbolt. RME offers up to date drivers still TODAY for their early interfaces. Apogee are known to also abandon interfaces. still, i'd have that with RME's ROCK SOLID drivers over a duet any day. I'd love to see a big project with the duet set at 32 or even 64 samples without crackles and popsīabyface Pro is a better interface, but now I can see you are talking about the old babyface. Reading ms numbers is meaningless because what matters is how it PERFORMS at those numbers. No there's only a MASSIVE topic at gearslutz about how problematic duet 2's have been. Sorry to hear that you have! any need to roll your eyes? I'm pretty sure that I'm not the only one who thinks that Duet sounds better than Old Babyface and I have also never experienced any issues with Duet FW or Duet 2. 44,1 kHz 64 samples Duet 5,8 ms, Babyface 6,1 ms -Ĥ4,1 kHz 128 samples Duet 8,7 ms, Babyface 9,0 ms.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |